Analysis Report for AUST56 ($14NOV01XA) (Analyzed by David Gordon, Goddard Space Flight Center. Spoolfile source: interactive solve/nuSolve analysis.) Problems: None. Parameterization comments: Three clock breaks are set at Hobart12: 01:09:59 (-1.4 nsec), 14:55:43 (-0.6 nsec), and 22:09:47 (-1.6 nsec). Other comments: Some short windstows at Hobart12, one lasting ~45 minutes. ----------------------------------------- Session Statistics Observations: 4347 scheduled 4136 correlated (in database) 4037 recoverable (usable) 3955 used Session fit: 43.401 ps ----------------------------------------- Station Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12 2187 1915 1873 85.6% KATH12M 2186 2081 2039 93.3% WARK12M 2138 2010 1972 92.2% YARRA12M 2183 2068 2026 92.8% --------------- --------- ----------- --------- ------ Station Total** 4347 4037 3955 91.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. ** Total includes distinct observations only. MISSED: Station was scheduled, but it did not observe. NOT CORR: Station was scheduled but not correlated. NOT USED: Usable data was generated for this station, but the analyst rejected it all. ----------------------------------------- Source Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Correlated* Used % of scheduled obs used 1424-418 126 114 99 78.6% 0637-752 166 157 145 87.3% 0834-201 87 78 78 89.7% 1308+328 25 19 19 76.0% 1657-261 22 17 17 77.3% 1334-127 97 88 80 82.5% 0727-115 81 78 76 93.8% 1921-293 111 99 97 87.4% 4C39.25 29 26 26 89.7% 2232-488 107 107 100 93.5% 0516-621 60 60 59 98.3% OJ287 65 62 60 92.3% 2142-758 81 75 75 92.6% 0521-365 97 94 94 96.9% 1611+343 36 33 27 75.0% 0454-463 112 112 110 98.2% 1144-379 112 106 105 93.8% 1510-089 80 71 64 80.0% 1124-186 49 49 48 98.0% 0748+126 53 50 50 94.3% 1749+096 71 68 62 87.3% 1038+064 17 17 16 94.1% 1519-273 91 87 68 74.7% 1255-316 43 43 40 93.0% 0454-810 198 186 180 90.9% 0826-373 19 19 19 100.0% 0919-260 15 15 13 86.7% 1045-188 30 30 29 96.7% NRAO530 79 67 64 81.0% 1610-771 6 6 6 100.0% 1741-038 79 76 70 88.6% 1451-375 33 30 25 75.8% 1128+385 20 20 19 95.0% 2149-306 85 76 74 87.1% 1954-388 67 64 64 95.5% 1908-201 21 21 19 90.5% 1633+38 33 30 23 69.7% 2355-534 79 79 74 93.7% 1057-797 48 45 39 81.2% 3C274 7 5 4 57.1% 1751+288 32 26 26 81.2% 2255-282 86 83 82 95.3% 1958-179 96 84 84 87.5% 1920-211 24 21 21 87.5% 2131-021 68 62 57 83.8% 1144+402 14 14 14 100.0% 1104-445 19 18 16 84.2% 2136+141 4 2 1 25.0% 2029+121 25 22 21 84.0% 0003-066 23 22 22 95.7% 2145+067 71 70 68 95.8% VR422201 9 9 8 88.9% 2227-088 36 33 33 91.7% 3C446 84 84 81 96.4% 0332-403 98 98 98 100.0% 0106+013 74 74 72 97.3% CTA102 19 19 18 94.7% 2234+282 24 24 23 95.8% 0537-441 122 119 118 96.7% 0202-172 20 20 20 100.0% 0202+319 28 28 27 96.4% 0119+115 61 61 61 100.0% 0537-286 25 25 24 96.0% 0229+131 9 9 9 100.0% 0426-380 108 108 108 100.0% 0607-157 91 88 82 90.1% CTA26 67 67 62 92.5% 0234+285 38 38 37 97.4% 0454-234 90 87 87 96.7% 1933-400 7 7 7 100.0% 0420-014 82 82 82 100.0% 2052-474 13 13 11 84.6% 0552+398 25 25 25 100.0% 0528+134 34 34 34 100.0% 0648-165 36 36 36 100.0% 0657+172 12 12 12 100.0% 0738+313 12 12 11 91.7% 0308-611 18 15 14 77.8% 0437-454 6 6 6 100.0% ------------ --------- ---------- ------ ------ Source Total 4347 4136 3955 91.0% * Correlated: included in database ----------------------------------------- Baseline Performance Number of Observations Scheduled Recoverable* Used % of scheduled obs used HOBART12-KATH12M 720 636 622 86.4% HOBART12-WARK12M 737 639 624 84.7% HOBART12-YARRA12M 730 640 627 85.9% KATH12M-WARK12M 707 694 683 96.6% KATH12M-YARRA12M 759 751 734 96.7% WARK12M-YARRA12M 694 677 665 95.8% ----------------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------ Baseline Total 4347 4037 3955 91.0% * Recoverable: can be included in the solution. MISSED: Baseline was scheduled, but at least one of the sites did not observe. NOT CORR: Baseline was scheduled but not correlated. NO DATA: The baseline's stations were both correlated, but they did not observe together. DESELECTED: Usable data was generated for the baseline, but the analyst rejected it.